Variability in postpacing intervals predicts global ventricular activation pattern during tachycardia.

INTRODUCTION: Assessment of ventricular activation pattern is critical to the successful ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT). We have previously shown that the global atrial activation pattern during tachycardia can be rapidly and accurately assessed by calculating the postpacing interval variability (PPIV); PPIV was minimal in circuitous tachycardias and highly variable in centrifugal tachycardias. In the present study, we use the PPIV to determine the ventricular global activation pattern during VT. METHODS: Patients with mappable VT were included. We defined global ventricular activation as either centrifugal (arising from a focus with radial expansion) or circuitous (gross macro-reentrant circuit), based on the findings of electroanatomic mapping. PPIV was calculated as the difference in postpacing interval with right ventricular apical overdrive pacing during tachycardia at cycle lengths (CL) 10 ms and 30-ms shorter than tachycardia, regardless of the origin of the tachycardia. We studied 20 patients with 23 VTs (11 centrifugal, mean CL 390 +/- 36.1 ms; 12 circuitous, mean CL 418 +/- 75.7 ms). RESULTS: The mean PPIV was 45 +/- 16 ms for patients with centrifugal VT and 6.7 +/- 4.1 ms for patients with circuitous VT. Rank sum analysis of PPIV showed a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the global ventricular activation pattern during VT can be rapidly and accurately defined by assessing the PPIV. This technique allows for a rapid confirmation of the tachycardia activation and significantly facilitates mapping and ablation.

Variability in post-pacing intervals predicts global atrial activation pattern during tachycardia.

INTRODUCTION: Knowledge of the global atrial activation pattern is critical to ablation of an atrial arrhythmia. We hypothesized that the variability in post-pacing intervals (PPIs) with pacing at different cycle lengths (CLs) from the same pacing site, regardless of distance to the circuit, can be used to identify atrial activation patterns during tachycardia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients referred for ablation of organized atrial arrhythmias were included (n = 28, 31 total tachycardias). The variability in PPIs (PPIV) was calculated by comparing the difference in PPIs after overdrive pacing with 5-second trains 10, 20, and 30 ms shorter than the tachycardia cycle length (TCL). The global activation pattern was defined as circuitous (macroreentrant atrial circuit) or centrifugal (focal origin with centrifugal radiation) by electroanatomic mapping. Except for one case, all pacing was performed from the proximal coronary sinus bipole. Circuitous tachycardias (n = 17, all macro-reentrant) exhibited minimal variability with pacing at 10 ms and 30 ms shorter than TCL (6.0 +/- 2.5 ms), whereas centrifugal tachycardias (n = 14, 8 microreentrant) displayed a high degree of variability (56.5 +/- 20.6 ms). Rank sum analysis of PPIV suggests that the two groups are indeed distinct (P < 0.001). Using PPIV cutoffs of or=30 ms, circuitous and centrifugal activation patterns could be distinguished with a high degree of sensitivity (94% circuitous, 92.8% centrifugal) and 100% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the use of PPIV to rapidly and accurately predict the global activation pattern during atrial arrhythmia.